evidence with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evidence with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express the idea of providing evidence alongside something else, but it lacks clarity and proper usage. Example: "The report should include evidence with the findings to support the conclusions drawn."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

She hides the evidence with a wig.

The New York Times

She gave her evidence with remarkable dignity.

The Guardian - Opinion

But we await more evidence with interest.

The Guardian - Sport

Matt tagged the evidence with labels.

The New Yorker

She shared the evidence with friends and family.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

European diplomats will shrug off the evidence with a cool "unproven".

The New York Times

I decline to permit her to give evidence with her face covered.

The Guardian

4.13pm BST Patry Hoskins looks to compare Reid's evidence with that provided by Clarke.

The Guardian

*More freely exchange evidence with intelligence agencies, including information obtained by wiretaps.

The New York Times

They accused us of conjuring up the evidence with smoke and mirrors.

The Guardian - Opinion

The committee has already taken one week's evidence, with more sessions scheduled this week.

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for precision, consider using more specific prepositions like "supported by" or "accompanied by" instead of "with" to clarify the relationship you intend to convey.

Common error

Avoid relying solely on "with" to link evidence to findings. Vary your preposition choice to accurately reflect the relationship, such as "supporting", "corroborating", or "contradicting".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidence with" functions as a prepositional phrase, often aiming to link evidence to related information or findings. While commonly used, Ludwig AI suggests it lacks grammatical precision and often needs restructuring for clarity.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

37%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "evidence with" appears frequently across various contexts, particularly in news and scientific media, Ludwig AI flags it as grammatically questionable. Its general purpose is to connect evidence to related findings, but its vagueness often necessitates more precise language. Alternatives like "evidence supported by" or "evidence accompanied by" enhance clarity. When writing, avoid over-reliance on "with" and consider the specific relationship you're trying to convey. For example, the expert rating assigned a score of 3.2, reflecting a need for improved grammatical correctness and precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

evidence accompanied by

Replaces "with" to emphasize the inclusion of evidence alongside something else.

evidence supported by

Highlights that the evidence lends support or validation to a claim.

evidence in conjunction with

Emphasizes the combined consideration of evidence and another element.

evidence connected to

Focuses on the link or association between the evidence and a specific subject.

evidence related to

Highlights the relevance of the evidence to a specific topic or area.

evidence combined with

Highlights that evidence is been added to another element to create something bigger.

evidence aligned with

Showcases the evidence compatibility with other element, idea or information.

data alongside

Highlights that data is been adding to another element to reinforce the main idea.

proof connected to

Emphasis on the connection between the proof and another element.

data to support

Focuses on using data in order to back another idea or claim.

FAQs

How can I use "evidence with" in a sentence?

While grammatically questionable, "evidence with" often aims to show a relationship. Consider restructuring for clarity, such as "evidence supported by" or "the evidence, accompanied by".

What prepositions can replace "with" in "evidence with" to improve clarity?

Depending on the context, alternatives to "evidence with" include prepositions such as "to", "for", "supporting", or "accompanied by". These can create stronger connections between the evidence and the related information.

Is it better to say "evidence with" or "evidence supported by"?

While "evidence with" is common, "evidence supported by" often offers clearer and grammatically sound construction. The phrase "evidence supported by" clearly indicates the evidence backs a particular conclusion.

What's the difference between "evidence with" and "data alongside"?

"Evidence with" is vague, while "data alongside" suggests a parallel presentation of data and another element, such as an argument. Using precise language enhances clarity.