Sentence examples for evidence weighting from inspiring English sources

The negotiation or discussion phase is important to ensure an accurate learner model representation, taking into account issues such as the recency of evidence, weighting of evidence, and even absence of evidence (e.g. for tasks that do not pass data to the learner model).

For example, one might choose to apply different weights to different forms of expression evidence, weighting protein-level expression most highly (e.g. a weight of 30), followed by microarray or RNA-seq evidence (e.g. 20), and applying a lower weight to noisy sources of evidence such as SAGE tags (e.g. 10).

A cyclic model proposed in their research consists of four phases, including Continuity of evidence, Patterns of evidence, Weight of evidence, and Manifestation of evidence.

When weighing evidence, weights are assigned to each piece of evidence, and then the body of evidence is weighed in favor of each hypothesis by amassing the weights.

Physical things considered in their own right evidence "weight, number, and measure" (Psalm 83 8), thereby causing us to contemplate their own measure, beauty, and order.

The evidence weights are summarized in Table S1.

The average evidence weight per study was 3.7 (range 1 9).

The average evidence weight per study on inundation was 4.8 (range 2 9).

The average evidence weight per study on scour was 3.2 (range 2 8).

The average evidence weight was 4.2 (range 3 7), and included 2 gradient models and 3 control impact studies.

The evidence weights and threshold (described below) were derived from an expert consultation process during the development of the Eco Evidence method (Norris and others 2012).