evidence to be

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evidence to be" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to express the idea of evidence that is meant to be or should be something, but it lacks clarity and context. Example: "The evidence to be presented in court must be compelling and relevant."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

There is evidence, to be sure.

Harvard Business Review

As evidence to be analyzed, DNA has certain advantages.

The New York Times - Science

It's also fine for evidence to be mixed.

The Guardian - Opinion

Circumstantial evidence, to be sure, but it is effective.

The Guardian - Film

A federal trial judge dismissed these serious allegations without allowing any evidence to be presented.

The New York Times

I found the father's evidence to be inconsistent, unreliable and unconvincing.

The Guardian

DNA testing is useful only when there is physical evidence to be tested.

The New York Times

There is the feeling of excavating for evidence to be re-examined and revalued.

The New York Times

At the time, they were hoping to collect evidence to be used in court.

The New York Times - Magazine

"I'm not sure I need to see much more evidence to be convinced," Professor Abrams said.

The New York Times - Arts

The administration favors such trials because they will allow sensitive evidence to be presented in secret.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Rephrase sentences using more direct and active language. Instead of "evidence to be presented", consider "evidence that will be presented" or "presented evidence".

Common error

Avoid using "evidence to be" in contexts where a more direct and active construction would be clearer and more impactful. This phrase often leads to wordy sentences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidence to be" functions as a modifier, often used to describe evidence that is intended for a specific purpose, such as being presented, analyzed, or considered. However, according to Ludwig AI, it often introduces unnecessary wordiness and passive voice, which is better if replaced with alternatives.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

38%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "evidence to be" is frequently used across various domains, including news, science, and formal writing, it is often considered grammatically awkward. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, it introduces unnecessary wordiness and can usually be replaced with clearer, more direct alternatives such as "available evidence", "presented evidence", or rephrasing the sentence for better clarity. Prioritizing active voice and precise language will enhance the effectiveness of your writing, especially in formal contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

evidence that is

Replaces the infinitive with a more direct relative clause.

evidence which is

Similar to "evidence that is", but uses 'which' instead of 'that'.

available evidence

Focuses on the availability of the evidence.

evidence presented

Emphasizes the act of presenting the evidence.

evidence under consideration

Highlights that the evidence is currently being evaluated.

evidence for consideration

Similar to 'evidence under consideration' but focusing on a future action.

evidence to consider

A more concise way of suggesting the evidence needs evaluation.

evidence that will be

More explicit about the future state of the evidence.

potential evidence

Highlights the possibility that something might be evidence.

existing evidence

Emphasizes the current existence of the evidence.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "evidence to be" for better clarity?

Consider using phrases like "available evidence", "presented evidence", or "evidence that is" depending on the specific context.

Is "evidence to be" grammatically correct?

While commonly found, "evidence to be" is often considered grammatically awkward. It's better to opt for clearer alternatives such as "evidence that will be" or rephrasing the sentence entirely.

What's the difference between "evidence to be presented" and "presented evidence"?

"Evidence to be presented" suggests a future action, while "presented evidence" implies the evidence has already been shown or submitted.

When is it appropriate to use "evidence to be"?

Although frequently used, using "evidence that is", "available evidence" or restructuring your sentence is recommended for clearer communication.