Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(11)
The empirical evidence group undertook several data-collection steps.
In the case of the empirical evidence group, data summary and synthesis proceeded along two paths.
Scientific evidence as a product attribute was discussed by 58% of the low scientific evidence group and 46% of those in the high scientific evidence group as a factor related to their product choice(s).
The relative inflexibility of our expert panel in committing interventions to the level II evidence group is one positive feature.
Then the research team was divided into two review groups: a definitions and theory group, and an empirical evidence group.
We also focused on Clusters A and B for predicting new target genes from the "no evidence" group.
Similar(46)
The sample was purposive and included 12,447 children, 2324 young adults and 2449 stakeholders representing five different evidence groups: children in the family, at the workplace, in schools, on the streets and in institutions.
Similarly, enabling improved activities of daily living led to greater levels of independence in both scientific evidence groups.
The advice of health care providers appeared to be playing slightly different roles in the decision making process for participants in the high and low scientific evidence groups.
There is no evidence the group helped plan the attack.
The absence of dissension was perceived as evidence that group conformity was operating.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com