Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
First created in 1983, the NTP's 5-tiered classification system describes the strength of evidence for conclusions for NTP chemical carcinogenesis studies.
Similar(58)
The rules are characterized by various parameters, such as examples (i.e., number of objects covering a given rule), strength (i.e., the proportion of objects covered by premise that are also covered by conclusion), or confirmation (i.e., measure that is quantifying the degree to which premise provides evidence for conclusion).
There is evidence for both conclusions.
Given his scientific training, Leibowitz "argues" on the basis of empirical (most often historical) evidence for his conclusions regarding, for example, the centrality of mitzvoth in Judaism to the exclusion of mysticism, philosophy, or dogma.
Our discussion briefly reviews our evidence for these conclusions and places them in context with other works addressing the role of septins in fungal morphogenesis and virulence.
Reviewer #2: This paper presents evidence for three conclusions.
Our work provides experimental evidence for several conclusions.
The strength of evidence for these conclusions varies and will be discussed.
Although there is some evidence for efficacy, conclusions are limited by methodological challenges [ 4, 6– 9].
Others have reported concerns regarding the methodology or level of evidence for the conclusions presented by these authors.
The lack of a control series is another limitation of this study and reduces the evidence for definite conclusions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com