evidence for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evidence for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate support or justification for a claim, theory, or argument. Example: "The researchers presented compelling evidence for their hypothesis regarding climate change."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The evidence for that?

The New York Times

Evidence for this is thin.

The Economist

What's my evidence for that?

The New Yorker

New evidence for domestication.

The Guardian

There is no conclusive evidence for Pres.

The New Yorker

Tunisia has provided grim evidence for that.

The New York Times

The evidence for this, though, is equivocal.

The Economist

Yet the evidence for this is mixed.

The Economist

But the evidence for this is slim.

The Economist

(There is no evidence for this, either).

The New Yorker

There is some evidence for their belief.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "evidence for", ensure that the evidence you are presenting directly supports the claim you are making. Be specific and avoid vague or ambiguous statements.

Common error

Avoid presenting correlational data as direct "evidence for" a causal relationship. Just because two things occur together doesn't mean one causes the other. Always consider other potential factors and alternative explanations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidence for" functions as a prepositional phrase, typically used to introduce information that supports a claim or hypothesis. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s a correct and usable phrase in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Encyclopedias

20%

Science

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "evidence for" is a widely used and grammatically sound prepositional phrase. As Ludwig AI suggests, it serves to introduce supporting information for a claim or argument, appearing frequently in news, encyclopedias, and scientific contexts. Related phrases include "proof of", "support for", and "basis for", each offering slightly different nuances. When using the phrase, ensure that the evidence directly supports the claim and avoid mistaking correlation for causation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

proof of

This alternative is more direct and emphasizes the conclusive nature of the support.

support for

This alternative is broader and suggests backing or assistance, not necessarily conclusive proof.

basis for

This alternative highlights the foundation or reason upon which a claim is built.

grounds for

This alternative suggests a legitimate or justifiable reason for something.

justification for

This alternative emphasizes the act of showing something to be right or reasonable.

rationale for

This alternative focuses on the underlying reasons or logical basis.

reasons for

This alternative is a simple and direct way to ask for the causes or explanations.

validation for

This alternative emphasizes the act of confirming or proving the accuracy of something.

corroboration of

This alternative suggests confirmation or support through additional evidence.

substantiation of

This alternative highlights the act of providing evidence to support the truth of something.

FAQs

How can I use "evidence for" in a sentence?

Use "evidence for" to introduce support or justification for a claim. For example, "The study provides strong "evidence for" the effectiveness of the new treatment."

What can I say instead of "evidence for"?

You can use alternatives like "proof of", "support for", or "basis for" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "evidence of" or "evidence for"?

"Evidence of" generally refers to direct signs or indications, while "evidence for" refers to support or justification for a claim. For example, "evidence of tampering" vs. "evidence for a theory."

What's the difference between "evidence for" and "reasons for"?

"Evidence for" typically refers to factual support, while "reasons for" refers to explanations or justifications. Evidence aims to prove something; reasons aim to explain why something is the case.