Mr. Panetta did not elaborate on what the forensic evidence entailed.
By (2), knowledge security implies knowledge: evidence that entails p also entails anything that p entails, so if S has evidence that entails p, and believes q upon seeing it is entailed by p, then S's evidence entails q.
The underdetermination of theories by evidence entails that theories cannot be guided purely by the nature of the object.
The same holds for Williamson's conception of evidence as knowledge: inasmuch as any known proposition is true, inconsistency with one's evidence entails inconsistency with some truth.
Surely the belief that P is unjustified if the person who reaches conclusion couldn't "see" how the available evidence entails the conclusion.
How one proves that a condition is a disease depends partly on what criteria of disease we can agree upon, but even without giving a definition of disease, one can see that the claim that the empirical evidence entails that alcoholism is a disease is highly contestable.
Our previous two posts on the role of mind in nature have argued that rational analysis of the empirical evidence entails that the world is not only influenced by ideas, but consists of them.
By Deepak Chopra, MD and Henry Stapp, PhD Our previous two posts on the role of mind in nature have argued that rational analysis of the empirical evidence entails that the world is not only influenced by ideas, but consists of them.
As is suggested by his use of this name, Williamson himself seems to think that the sameness of evidence requirement entails that the thinker's evidence is exhausted by the thinker's experiences.
But the expected degree of verisimilitude of a partial answer \(g\) given evidence \ e\) is given by If evidence \ e\) entails some \(h_{j}\) in \(B\), or makes \(h_{j}\) completely certain (i.e., \(P(h_{j}\mid e) = 1)\), then \ ver(g\mid e)\) reduces to \(Tr g,h_{j})\).
