everyone involved

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "everyone involved" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to all individuals who are part of a situation, event, or discussion. Example: "We appreciate the contributions of everyone involved in the project, as their efforts were crucial to its success."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Everyone involved agreed.

The New York Times

Know everyone involved.

The New York Times

Everyone involved understood why.

The New York Times

Thank you to everyone involved.

Independent

Everyone involved was surely agitated.

The New Yorker

Everyone involved followed standard practices.

The New York Times

But congratulations to everyone involved.

The Guardian - TV & Radio

Awesome work by everyone involved.

The Guardian - Music

I'm sad for everyone involved".

The Guardian

But everyone involved is a  teenager.

The New York Times

Almost everyone involved was a Hollywood neophyte.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing for an audience unfamiliar with legal terminology, "everyone involved" is preferable to the more formal phrase "all parties concerned".

Common error

While "everyone involved" is widely understood, it may sound too informal in highly professional or academic writing. Consider using "all stakeholders" or "all participants" for a more appropriate tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "everyone involved" functions as a collective noun phrase, referring to all individuals participating in or affected by a specific situation or event. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a common and acceptable phrase.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Formal & Business

15%

Science

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "everyone involved" is a grammatically sound and very common expression used to refer to all individuals participating in or affected by a situation. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English. It is most frequently used in news and media contexts and maintains a neutral tone, making it suitable for various settings, though "all participants" or "all stakeholders" might be preferred in formal writing. Remember to consider your audience when using this phrase and be mindful of potentially more appropriate alternatives in specific situations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

all participants

Directly refers to those taking part in something.

all those taking part

Similar to "all participants" but slightly more descriptive.

all parties concerned

More formal and often used in legal or official contexts.

each and every person

Emphasizes the individual inclusion of everyone.

everybody affected

Highlights those who experience the consequences.

all members

Refers to members of a group or organization.

all stakeholders

Focuses on those with a vested interest in the outcome.

the entire team

Specifically refers to a group working together.

each person implicated

Implies involvement in a negative or complex situation.

the collective

Refers to a group considered as a whole.

FAQs

How can I use "everyone involved" in a sentence?

You can use "everyone involved" to refer to all the people who are taking part in something or are affected by it. For example, "We need to get input from "all parties concerned" to make a decision".

What's the difference between "everyone involved" and "all stakeholders"?

"Everyone involved" is a general term for all participants or those affected. "All stakeholders", on the other hand, specifically refers to individuals or groups with a vested interest in the outcome.

Which is more formal, "everyone involved" or "all participants"?

"All participants" is generally considered more formal than "everyone involved", and is often used in more professional settings. You can also use alternatives like ""all parties concerned"".

What can I say instead of "everyone involved" to emphasize a negative situation?

In a negative context, you might use "each person implicated" to highlight the connection of individuals to a problem or difficult situation.