Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Second, I don't think, that "every sentient creature deserves equal consideration for the opportunity to continue living without suffering".
But then again, this was the Dr. Singer who literally wrote the book on the rights of non-humans, "Animal Liberation," in which he argued that every sentient creature deserves equal consideration for the opportunity to continue living, without suffering.
Similar(58)
He rejected the view of some of his contemporaries that every action of a living, sentient creature has a selfish motive, noting that some birds will feed their blind companions.
Human beings, they believed, should not inflict harm on any sentient creature.
How do you decide who deserves ownership over a sentient creature that can't speak for itself?
Or just the notion that any sentient creature could fall asleep on a surfboard in open water?
"Is it all right to boil a sentient creature alive just for our gustatory pleasure?" he asked.
This is limited to major crimes, for example if you get caught with simpleton soot or kill a sentient creature.
As its operational guidelines make clear, harming any sentient creature is counter to the ELF's morality.
When we refuse to consume animal products, we reject the injustice of treating any sentient creature as a thing for us to use.
And that should excite you whether you're a man or a woman, or just a sentient creature with a heart.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com