For the second set of hypothesis, by analyzing each technique separately (lines of Table 5), every null hypothesis of equality must be rejected, since every technique present no overlap between the confidence intervals at each level.
In summary, the rejection of every null hypothesis of equality is a strong evidence of the influence of the failure profiles over the performance of the general prioritization techniques.
As a consequence, its distribution is indeed micro-canonical, but, what is more, every member of the ensemble satisfies the hypothesis of traversing every phase point with the given total energy.
Multiple comparisons were performed every time the null hypothesis of equality of the median scores was rejected.
For a finite number of hypotheses, indifference means that every hypothesis gets equal probability.
Finally, even in the best possible case for meta-analysis based on HRs, where every study reports the HR and every study tests the null hypothesis of PH and fails to reject it, it should be remembered that trials are not powered to detect departure from PH [ 16], and a superior test of PH can always be achieved by an IPD meta-analysis of the entire set of trials.
Thereby, the boxplots in the figures already mentioned are enough to reject every null hypotheses of the first set, in another words, the techniques perform different at each failure profile isolatedly.
Absence of double crossovers on all chromosome arms for every progeny would confirm the hypothesis of complete interference.
A Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test was performed for every trait against the null hypothesis of no strain effect.
Since a belief entails the denial of every contrary hypothesis, this closure principle in effect says that I cannot be justified in believing p unless I am justified in denying every hypothesis contrary to p — that is, unless I can rule out all contrary hypotheses.
