The phrase "evaluative perspective" is correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to the way in which someone evaluates or assesses a situation, concept, or idea. It can be used to describe one's personal opinion or viewpoint on a particular topic. Example: From an evaluative perspective, I believe that education should focus more on practical skills rather than just theoretical knowledge.
In part, Friedman's point is that sharing an evaluative perspective in the way that constitutes the intimacy of friendship involves coming to adopt her values as parts of my own sense of value.
Nietzsche's evaluative perspective is privileged, in turn, because it involves asssessing (i) prudential value (value for an agent) in terms of degree of power, and (ii) non-prudential value in terms of maximization of prudential value (i.e., maximization of power).
If Nietzsche is not a realist about value, then he must be an anti-realist: he must deny that there is any objective fact of the matter that would privilege his evaluative perspective over its target.
Henry Etzkowitz and Loet Leydesdorff first proposed the triple helix model from three perspectives: evolutionary economics, the sociology of science and technology, and the sociology of higher education, as well as policy analysis with an evaluative perspective, (Etzkowitz & Leydesdorff 1995).
The fact that we are interested in is not the attitude towards alcohol limits as such, but the relationship between the given limits and the positive or negative deviations from an evaluative perspective.
So Nietzsche, on this account, does not claim that his evaluative perspective is veridical; he simply claims that it enjoys a certain sort of interpersonal appeal, owing to our "common attitude to remarkable men," "our tendency to admire certain individuals," to find them aesthetically appealing.
The result is the "Götterdämmerung of all evaluative perspectives" including its own [Weber 1904/1949, 86].
It was completely different from the evaluative, numerical view of experience of his number-crunching contemporaries.
Moreover, from an Australian perspective, other evaluative research has identified concerns about the assessment of a similar junior doctor population in Australia [ 30– 32], with observations indicating "that the tools and processes being used to monitor and assess junior doctor performance could be better" [ 32].
Two MHF evaluative activities provide independent perspectives on the transformation efforts and activities in each site: MHF agreement with the site's PCMH-A scores, and MHF assessment of the extent to which practices had the capacity to transform and were making meaningful changes to practice systems the Tiering tool.
Two classics on time and deontic logic are Thomason 1981b and Thomason 1981a, where temporal and deontic interactions are discussed, including an often invoked distinction between deliberative 'ought's (future-oriented/decision-oriented 'ought's) versus judgmental 'ought's (past, present or future oriented 'ought's from a purely evaluative, rather than action-oriented perspective).
