"evaluative features" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is generally used to refer to the characteristics or features of something that help us evaluate or judge it's quality or value. For example, "The evaluative features of the car will help us decide if it is the right one for us."
It is fitting because it gets right certain moral (or evaluative) features of a soldier's world — that good soldiers depend on each other, come to love each other, and have duties to care and bring each other safely home.
There Watson advances a mesh theory between the motivational and the evaluative features of rational agency.
However, as the following section shows, this framework does not adequately account for the types of evaluative features commonly found in history textbooks.
The features of action that have come in for the most attention are, first, its calculative structure, second, its attributability, third, its role in social practice, and fourth, its evaluative features, and they will be discussed in that order.
As Affect was found to be far more common than Judgment in Myskow's (2015) corpus, neither of the Appraiser voices adequately capture the most salient evaluative features of history textbooks.
These configurations of Appraisal resources in history textbooks do not fit neatly in Coffin's existing Voices of History Framework, which, as mentioned previously, was developed to account for the evaluative features of different types of written genres in school history.
Although a few studies have explored the SoP's textual and rhetorical features and evaluative norms (Brown 2004; Chiu, 2015, 2016; Ding, 2007; Dubb, 2011; Samraj & Monk, 2008), to date a thorough examination of disciplinary variations in SoP writing remains missing nor have findings been based on corpus-driven analysis.
He begins by identifying, as the fundamental distinctive feature of evaluative judgments that which lends them a special character that evaluative judgments are intended to guide conduct.
Apparent overconfidence and underconfidence in clinicians making clinical judgements could be a feature of evaluative research designs that fail to accurately represent clinical environments.
However, the defender of hierarchy could reply that it is specific uses of these words, in context, that pick out features that have evaluative valence.
Learning based upon this evaluative feedback is the key feature of the reinforcement learning that makes it appealing as the computational framework of the S-BMI [28].
