Sentence examples for evaluative I from inspiring English sources

Perhaps the most basic division in play is evaluative, i.e., whether the emotion is good or bad.

Furthermore, measures with adequate psychometric properties are often either primarily evaluative, i.e. illustrating the extent to which perceptions are positive or negative, or they focus on single dimensions of the aging experience such as anxiety about aging or felt-age.

The first measurement was performed by Evaluative I (individual therapist I), and the second examination was carried out 20 minutes later, performed by Evaluative II (individual therapist II).

The tool aims to provide evaluative data for the conference as well as learning opportunities through the evaluation (i.e. personal reflection) for the Academy of Human Resource Development conferences and other similar professional and academic conferences.

In the context of evaluating the crime drop, we are concerned with the concept of vertical equity: "the unequal, but equitable, treatment of unequals" (Mooney and Jan 1997: 80) as an evaluative criterion i.e. different levels of reduction in victimisation (the unequal) amongst those individuals or areas experiencing different levels of crime (the unequals).

There were three independent evaluative criteria (i.e., hypothesis testing, nonoverlapping 95% confidence intervals, and alternative quantitative criteria).

The EDQLS was designed for an evaluative purpose, (i.e., to measure change over time within individuals) [ 17], such as for the assessment of patients' treatment progress and the outcomes of new treatments [ 11].

The focus of the checklist is on studies on measurement properties of HR-PROs used in an evaluative application, i.e. longitudinal assessment of treatment effects or changes in health over time.

For each of the 20 participants we calculated the number of evaluative statements (i.e. with a positive or negative directionality) for each of the eleven information categories as an index of the importance of the information category.

The former are inherently more subjective and involve an evaluative element (i.e. are you satisfied with the outcome of your treatment?), and the latter are intentionally factual, more objective, and directly ask patients the extent to which their health has changed as a consequence of treatment (i.e. did the treatment that you received improve health?) [ 69].

The HAQ met the standards we set for responsiveness and its test-retest reliability was found to be very high in a sample of stable patients, indicating that the scale is appropriate for evaluative purposes (i.e., to track physical functioning over time), both at the group level and at the individual level.