Sentence examples for evaluations were compared from inspiring English sources

Scores from these evaluations were compared with several criteria of their medical school performance.

The "subjective" evaluations were compared with the "objective" measures of workplace architecture and indoor climate.

In addition, the current state-of-practice in performance-based seismic evaluations were compared.

The automatic speech evaluations were compared to a control group of 40 speakers without speech pathology in this study.

There was no difference in the frequency of the diagnosis of delirium when the morning and afternoon evaluations were compared (52.9% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.06).

When the two evaluations were compared we found a non-significant difference in IST and ISRT force values at baseline (IST 0.03; ISRT 0.02) and at 6 months (IST 0.02; ISRT 0.01).

Baseline information from the 576 formal study evaluations was compared with the non-evaluated sample (n=455), the outcomes of which were to be ascribed from multiple imputation.

The results of the presented evaluations are compared with outputs of independent analyses.

The QHES instrument consists of 16 criteria addressing methodological characteristics and transparency of reporting, and against which economic evaluations are compared.

Data from the impact evaluation were compared from baseline to follow-up using McNemar's test (dichotomous variables) and Wilcoxon signed rank test (scales/continuous variables).

The results of this evaluation were compared against a traditional ECA-based system and we found that ESR outperformed existing systems with respect to subscription efficiency.