Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Baseline information from the 576 formal study evaluations was compared with the non-evaluated sample (n=455), the outcomes of which were to be ascribed from multiple imputation.
Similar(59)
The results of the presented evaluations are compared with outputs of independent analyses.
Scores from these evaluations were compared with several criteria of their medical school performance.
The "subjective" evaluations were compared with the "objective" measures of workplace architecture and indoor climate.
The results of the evaluations were compared with the results of non-NTM BE patients.
Afterwards, each evaluation was compared with the evaluations performed by the other observers.
For this aim, the requirements for a more rigorous, controlled evaluation are compared with our experiences of evaluating a health care reform project in the Slovak republic.
Moreover, our approach for worst case norm evaluation is compared with other approaches available in literature.
This short-term evaluation is compared with the experiments in a stirred bioreactor under chemostat mode at various agitation speeds.
The results of the MRI evaluation were compared with smell and taste test values using the Pearson and Spearman correlation.
The results of the CEC evaluation were compared with those of the original programmatic classification.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com