As can be seen from the Figure 2, the numbers of full economic evaluation papers are scarce.
In comparison to the program evaluation papers identified, three times as many papers were found that reported RH descriptive or prevalence data in humanitarian settings.
Papers excluded under these criteria but that reported descriptive or prevalence data were logged to permit comparison of the sectoral spread of evaluation papers (the focus here) and broader prevalence or descriptive papers.
For example, the current version of the Textpresso celluar component category contains the phrase 'microtubule organizing center', while the version of that phrase used in one of the evaluation papers was 'microtubule-organizing center'.
In a review of 14 Malaysian economic evaluation papers from 1999 to 2011, 6– 19 it was found that most reported cost-effectiveness outcomes were based solely on the average cost-effectiveness ratio without considering the ICER.
We considered descriptive and evaluation papers focusing on urban or rural primary health care facilities (e.g., health centres, health posts, dispensaries, community pharmacies), where the authors described at least one measure to enhance community accountability that was linked with those facilities.
After an initial evaluation, papers in final analysis were divided into 2 categories: (1) primary PET: studies focused on primary PET screening for cancer; and (2) selective PET: studies that reported findings in lung cancer CT screening programs with selective PET.
This article will complement the CAFA2 evaluation paper to be published by the organizers elsewhere in the near future.
The four two-locus models and simulation parameters (penetrance matrices, number of SNPs, allele frequency and sample size) employed in the original MDR power evaluation paper by Ritchie et al. [ 16] were used for comparison against the KWII.
This largely descriptive service evaluation paper focuses on the 'baseline characteristics' of referred clients (i.e., previously assessed characteristics or those identified within the first two months following service presentation).
