Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
Data from the impact evaluation were compared from baseline to follow-up using McNemar's test (dichotomous variables) and Wilcoxon signed rank test (scales/continuous variables).
The results of this evaluation were compared against a traditional ECA-based system and we found that ESR outperformed existing systems with respect to subscription efficiency.
The results of the MRI evaluation were compared with smell and taste test values using the Pearson and Spearman correlation.
Mean changes between both treatments at each evaluation were compared with ANOVA.
The results of the CEC evaluation were compared with those of the original programmatic classification.
The data obtained from the semiquantitative evaluation were compared using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test.
Similar(49)
For this aim, the requirements for a more rigorous, controlled evaluation are compared with our experiences of evaluating a health care reform project in the Slovak republic.
Afterwards, each evaluation was compared with the evaluations performed by the other observers.
Moreover, our approach for worst case norm evaluation is compared with other approaches available in literature.
Automatic evaluation was compared to perceptual ratings by a panel of experts and to an age-matched control group.
This short-term evaluation is compared with the experiments in a stirred bioreactor under chemostat mode at various agitation speeds.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com