Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
All samples were received from different hematology practices in the United States, and were evaluated as part of routine hematological evaluation (Table 1).
The group designed an evaluation table of these risks.
The pattern of biomarker improvement was similar at the 1-y evaluation (Table 5).
An evaluation table for this measure was developed based on the time required to create weapons-grade materials.
Modified criteria developed by Flynn [3] were used for evaluation (Table 1).
Both groups did not show abnormalities in neuropsychological evaluation (Table 2).
The lowest score was 8 out of 12 in the first group evaluation (Table 3).
Then, I made an evaluation table and gave each lab marks for a number of important criteria.
The preoperative and postoperative values of different components of ICFSG score system were listed in 3 tables delineating the morphology (Table 2), the functional evaluation (Table 3) and the radiologic evaluation (Table 4).
In terms of geometric characteristics evaluation, Table 2 indicates threshold values of geometric features for national and regional network.
Table 2 shows the R performance evaluation, Table 3 the Octave performance evaluation, and Table 4 the MATLAB performance evaluation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com