The evaluation data are shown by means of the developmental results over a period of time; that is, calculating the difference between the evaluation pairs.
On the 'naturalness' evaluation, a paired comparison test was carried out, where each subject listened to pairs of speech converted by the two methods and selected which sample sounded more natural.
Two studies have been carried out on diesel motor sounds: firstly, the panel of experts of a car maker made a conventional sensory profile and an evaluation by paired comparison.
Visual evaluation of paired (unburned and burned) true color photos of organic soil layer thickness revealed that severely burned forest sites (CBI > 2) had lost between 5 and 10 cm of the thick live moss and lichen cover observed at every unburned forest site surveyed in 2017.
Statistical evaluation of paired samples was performed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test; Mann-Whitney rank sum test and t-test were used for non-paired samples.
Evaluation of paired pre- and on-treatment samples was performed by Wilcoxon's signed rank test.
The communities included in the evaluation were paired, so that, in each state, there was an urban and a rural pair.
The reliability of the questionnaire was tested in a test-retest study by a non-parametric statistical method for evaluation of paired data.
Studied parameters were compared for various classification methods and over-time evaluation techniques (paired samples) by applying the sign test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Friedman test.
An ideal experimental comparison for tumor copy-number evaluation comprises paired, normal tissue samples processed simultaneously with the tumor specimens thereby eliminating technical variability from personnel and batch effects.
