The metrics used for performance evaluation are packet delivery ratio, average E2E delay, and average queue length per node.
In the evaluation of packet error rates, we use the stored received signal strength indication (RSSI) data, which were obtained from experiments with three subjects in a realistic scenario composed of a series of different actions and postures in a mixed-indoor/outdoor environment.
The performance metrics that we consider in our evaluations are packet delivery ratio, packet delivery delay, and cost.
Hence, the performance of the proposed FTCSPM is evaluated based on performance evaluation parameters viz., packet delivery ratio, energy consumption, average end-to-end delay, packet drop rate and throughput.
The metrics used for the performance evaluation include throughput, packet delivery ratio (PDR), end-to-end delay, energy consumption and packet delivery security.
Figure 10 shows the evaluation results of packet delivery ratio.
The performance evaluation metrics include, packet delivery ratio, routing overhead, end-to-end delay, and energy consumption w.r.t.
Our scenario- based evaluation shows minimal packet loss and smooth mode-switch operation, thus indicating a reliable implementation of the DMAMAC protocol.
It allows the performance evaluation (e.g., packet delivery rate, transmission latency and energy consumption) at high level, but with elaborate models of the hardware and software of sensor nodes.
In the evaluation of the nrtPS packet service delay, we account also for the effects of the UGS, rtPS, and ertPS service flows.
