Sentence examples for evaluation of titles from inspiring English sources

Initial evaluation of titles and abstracts identified 22 related articles.

Eight hundred and sixty-four were excluded after evaluation of titles and abstracts.

Vogiatzi, C. Siristatidis, and M. Creatsa) performed the primary evaluation of titles and abstracts identified through the publication identification process, and each author provided a list of potentially eligible studies.

In a systematic review, the process of document selection (inclusion and exclusion) is performed in two phases: (a) the evaluation of titles and abstracts, followed by (b) the evaluation of full texts.

For example, item 5 does not explicitly indicate whether a list of documents excluded in each phase of selection (i.e., after evaluation of titles and abstracts, and after full-text assessment) should be reported.

Of the 365 articles found, 158 were duplicates, 105 items were excluded based on the evaluation of title and abstract and 90 papers were excluded after appraisal of their full text (S3 Table 6. Excluded studies).

Evaluation of title, abstract, and full-text led to 12 eligible studies [ 14– 18, 23– 29].

For this reason, giant evaluations of Title I are not valuable.

After evaluation of the titles and abstracts, eight were selected.

Using the process described in Figure  1, we selected approximately 10% (n = 1311) of the original search total (n = 13,240) for evaluation of abstracts; titles excluded at this stage were clearly not of relevance e.g. relating to non-healthcare safety topics.

Of a total of 1096 citations, there were 387 unique potentially relevant citations identified and 301 of these were excluded after evaluation of the title and abstract.