Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
Alternative protocols should be designed to allow an evaluation of these samples.
The evaluation of these samples was clearly more challenging for a number of reasons.
Combined bisulphite restriction analysis evaluation of these samples revealed different grades of MGMT promoter methylation of the tumour DNA: 76 of 122 biopsy samples (62.3%) were unmethylated and 46 (37.7%) were methylated.
Morphometric evaluation of these samples, as stated in Materials and methods section, indicated that the percentage of cells with clear signs of autophagy was significantly higher (+23%) in α-synuclein knocked down T cells in comparison with control siRNA-transfected T cells.
Similar(56)
Phenotypic evaluation of the samples with these rare, non-synonymous variants revealed no patients with developmental delay, microcephaly, or other craniofacial anomalies, suggesting that these variants are unlikely to be pathogenic in a heterozygous state.
The microstructural evaluation of the samples was carried out by SEM/EDS.
EB made the histopathological evaluation of the samples and wrote the results.
Compressibility evaluation of the samples revealed poor compressibility of XMet while CryMet was directly compressible.
Incomplete block design was chosen by the panelists for the evaluation of the samples.
The validity of the SECM measurements was supported by topographical analysis and optical evaluation of the samples after the measurements.
We thank Prof. Jahn Martin Nesland at Division of Pathology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital for performing the initial histopathological evaluation of the samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com