Sentence examples for evaluation of the section from inspiring English sources

A small pilot evaluation of the section and sentence detection algorithms showed good performance.

The initial evaluation of the section and sentence detection algorithms demonstrated a sensitivity and positive predictive value of 100% when detecting sections, and a sensitivity of 89% and a positive predictive value of 94% when detecting sentences.

Morphometric evaluation of the sections was carried out as described previously [6].

A lower limit for meaningful plaque detection was determined by direct microscopic evaluation of the sections with the lowest plaque loads.

The evaluation of the sections was performed by two experienced observers blinded to the patient diagnosis.

Staining and evaluation of the sections were performed as described previously (Dubois et al, 2004).

The classification was based on a manual visual evaluation of the sections without the use of any computer software programme.

Histological diagnosis was made by standard light-microscopic evaluation of the sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

KN participated in the design of the study, carried out a part of the surgeries, participated in the evaluation of the sections and drafted the manuscript.

Evaluation of the sections was performed using light microscopy (Polyvar, Reichert-Jung, Vienna, Austria) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (Zeiss, LSM 510 Meta, Vienna, Austria).

At time of data analysis, a repeated evaluation of the frozen section slides was performed and compared with the original frozen section report.