Sentence examples for evaluation of performance against from inspiring English sources

Evaluation of performance against the RSA (MPTM) endpoint was done at 2 years (Regnér et al. 1998).

Evaluation of performance against the RSA (MPTM) endpoint was done at 2 years (Toksvig-Larsen et al. 2000, Hansson et al. 2008) HA-coated (with or without porous coated tibial undersurface and without screw fixation) vs. cemented MB.

These three approaches focused on the 'specific' to achieve measurable objectives; continuous evaluation of performance against defined objectives, outputs and standards; and rationing of resources by effectiveness criteria to make the work of physicians more transparent through control and surveillance.

Evaluation of performance against the RSA (MPTM) endpoint was done at 2 years (Nilsson et al. 1999, 2006, Carlsson et al. 2005) HA-coated (with porous coated tibial undersurface and with screw fixation) vs. porous coated MB with screw fixation).

Evaluation of performance against the RSA (MPTM) endpoint was done at 2 years (Regnér et al. 1998, Nilsson et al. 1999, 2006, Toksvig-Larsen et al. 2000, Carlsson et al. 2005, Hansson et al. 2008, Pijls et al. 2010) HA-coated (with or without porous coated tibial undersurface and without screw fixation) vs. other implants (cemented MB and porous coated MB without screw fixation).

Evaluation of performance against the RSA (MPTM) endpoint was done at 2 years (Toksvig-Larsen et al. 2000, Nilsson et al. 1999, 2006, Carlsson et al. 2005, Hansson et al. 2008) HA-coated (with or without porous coated tibial undersurface and without screw fixation) vs. porous coated MB without screw fixation).

We conclude that the a priori establishment of performance expectations and the evaluation of performance of e-rater against these expectations help to ensure that automated scoring provides a positive contribution to the large-scale assessment of writing.

Evaluation of performance scalability has been conducted against a real corpus of web pages and documents.

Together, we provided a common currency (the prospect of meeting quantified objectives) for impartial evaluation of performance of alternative management options against diverse and often competing stakeholder agenda.

The critical step in the whole process then rests on the evaluation of technical performance against the predefined purpose.

Since a ground-truth does not exist for the considered dataset, the evaluation of performances of the proposed methodology needs to be carried out against human judgements or against the results produced by other algorithms.