Suggestions(5)
Similar(60)
The difference in viscosity of water (KCl) and glyceline 200 was found to be a crucial parameter in the evaluation of limiting current densities.
Apart from accurate evaluation of limit load, detailed evaluation of crack tip stresses and hence constraint near the crack tip has been performed using this new form of work principles.
In complete prevalidation process, characterization of analytical groups, checking of two limiting groups, testing of data homogeneity, establishment of analytical functions, recognition of outliers, evaluation of limiting values and extraction of prevalidation parameters were included.
The paper is devoted to the evaluation of limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) values in concentration domain by using 4 different approaches; namely 3σ and 10σ approaches, ULA2 approach, PBA approach and MDL approach.
On the other hand slip-line fields (SLF) have been extensively used not only for evaluation of limit load but also for obtaining sufficiently accurate estimates of stresses in the plastic region as well as in the vicinity of crack tip.
In addition, stimulation of the region is often necessary intraoperatively not only for evaluation of efficacy, but also for evaluation of limiting side-effects.
Our analytical investigation shows that diffusivity measurements via the new device lead to accurate analytical evaluations of limiting current density and concentration polarization in fuel cells.
In the previous diffusivity measurements via the electrochemical devices designed by the authors, the electronic conduction contribution of electrolyte materials was neglected, and an error in the subsequent evaluations of limiting current density and concentration polarization was consequently induced.
The evaluation of obtained limits is not a trivial problem.
The evaluation of quantification limits (N= 10 σ/S) was found to be 1.0 ×10−9 mol L−1.
A critical evaluation of endurance limits under very high cycle (giga-cycle range) fatigue is presented.
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com