Sentence examples for evaluation of assessment from inspiring English sources

Constant evaluation of assessment tests is warranted to insure their clinical utility.

An open and transparent evaluation of assessment criteria and processes by independent experts would be essential to build confidence in the new system: likewise, given what seems to have happened with the WCA, the contracting arrangements with providers of assessments would need to be examined to ensure that no biases are introduced into the assessment process.

Since these cooperation projects do not entirely support all relevant processes in terms of preparation, implementation and evaluation of assessment, in 2006 the Medical Assessment Alliance (MAA) was founded for mutual support.

Item response theory (IRT) is a group of modern methods especially developed for the construction and evaluation of assessment instruments, which in most cases are of nominal or ordinal type.

As the majority of the leads for clinical communication for each Medical School had been active participants in the development of the survey, there was a willingness to participate in this evaluation of assessment and an appreciation of the importance of determining all existing assessment opportunities within each curriculum.

The evaluation of assessment scores and relative effect sizes in this analysis demonstrate that despite clinical and research changes over the years, the response to treatment with olanzapine LAI as measured against placebo was comparable to results from earlier oral olanzapine clinical trials against placebo.

Encouraging a practical and systematic approach to the preparation, grading, examination and evaluation of assessments for evidence of contract cheating as presented in this paper will assist in a proactive way to address contract cheating behaviours at an institutional level.

The remaining assessment items primarily referred to student term papers (n = 10), group assessments (n = 7), student presentations (n = 7), content assessed on summative assessments (n = 6), the nature of feedback given to students (n = 6), and peer evaluation of assessments (n = 4).

The development, implementation and evaluation of assessments require considerable resources and often cannot be carried out by a single faculty/institution.

In addition, the most thorough evaluations of assessment models use an operating model that takes a different form than the assessment model.

These findings extend previous randomised evaluations of assessment reactivity, almost entirely obtained in studies of hazardous and harmful drinkers.