Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The bullseye browser display appeared to encourage limited evaluation of article relevance on titles, leading to poor performance.
Although IF are not an appropriate measure of the scientific quality of individual articles, they are widely accepted as a tool for the comparative evaluation of article sets [18].
Similar(58)
DB and PD helped in revisions, identification of additional articles, evaluation of articles and final redrafting.
Evaluation of articles for inclusion was conducted by two reviewers (DAF and KS).
NM carried out the literature search, selection and evaluation of articles.
TB participated in selection and evaluation of articles and revising the manuscript.
RWO participated in the design of the study, selection and evaluation of articles and revising the manuscript.
TMH participated in the design of the study, carried out the literature search, selection and evaluation of articles and writing of the review.
MT participated in the design of the study, carried out the literature search, selection and evaluation of articles and writing of the review.
DC assisted in the conduct of the systematic literature review, including the evaluation of articles for inclusion in the review and in drafting and finalising the manuscript for submission.
CHS assisted in the conduct of the systematic literature review, including the evaluation of articles for inclusion in the review and in drafting and finalising the manuscript for submission.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com