Sentence examples for evaluation change from inspiring English sources

Second, scientific research methods and standards of evaluation change with the theories or paradigms.

Asch critiques the experimental approach of many different psychologists, including Zillig, Moore, Marple, Sherif, Thorndike, and Lorge, in their investigations of evaluation change.

In the future we hope to investigate how student perceptions of consultation skills training overall from the annual evaluation change over time.

In a multivariable regression model, changes in HUI-III utilities were predicted only by changes in UPDRS-III scores (change per unit increase in UPDRS-III score -0.009, 95% CI -0.016 to -0.002) and time between first and last evaluation (change per week -0.017, 95% CI -0.028 to -0.006).

Exclusion criteria included alarm symptoms of disease of the lower gastrointestinal tract (recent onset of abdominal pain that normally would require medical evaluation, change in bowel habits), unexplained weight loss, occult anemia, rectal bleeding, and previous colonoscopy performed for any reason; minor abdominal discomfort and/or bloating were not considered as exclusion criteria.

It's why when employees switch bosses, more often than not their evaluation changes as well.

North Carolina secured $400 million in 2010 to be used to advance public education through technology, teacher training and evaluation, changes in classroom standards, and a focus on low-performing schools.

As part of a process evaluation changes in illness perceptions, perceived severity and social support are determined as well.

However, conventional longitudinal evaluation of change may not agree with patient perceived change if patients' understanding of the subjective construct under evaluation changes over time (response shift) or if patients' have inaccurate recollection (recall bias).

If through any number of mechanisms and internal processes, a patients' understanding or perception of the construct under evaluation changes over time then comparison of two longitudinal assessments may be analogous to comparison of the proverbial apple and orange.

Of these latter, according to the second method, eight patients were considered improved, two showed a worsened duodenal damage and only one remained unchanged; the evaluation changed in 91 % of cases.