Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The data required for the evaluation are collected at three-year intervals, evaluated, and published in a popular form.
Follow-up data for the effect evaluation are collected at 5 and 17 weeks after the start of the training by means of telephone interviews.
Data for the effect evaluation are collected by means of telephone interviews at baseline, and at 5 and 17 weeks after the start of the O&M-training.
Data for the effect evaluation are collected at baseline, and at 5 and 17 weeks after the start of the O&M-training during 40-minute interviews by telephone.
Similar(56)
Results of the developmental evaluation were collected and recorded in a data bank.
Given the emphasis on youth well-being and crime, the evaluation was collected on a variety of behavioral and criminal characteristics, which are divided into three groups.
The audio recordings used for performance evaluation were collected in a diverse set of acoustic environments using commercial grade external and built-in microphones.
Samples for microbiologic evaluation were collected from the aqueous humor or vitreous humor just before intravitreal administration of antibiotics or during vitrectomy and were sent to the laboratory for microscopy for Gram staining, potassium hydroxide mount, culture, and sensitivity.
Blood for clinical pathology evaluation was collected on days 3 and 15 (interim and terminal necropsy of groups 1 to 3) or days 7 and 19 (interim and terminal necropsy of group 4).
The BPH populations used for resistance evaluation were collected from the field in summer at Wuhan University and were fed continuously on Tai-chung Native 1 (TN1, a susceptible indica variety) under greenhouse condition.
The speech material for the evaluation was collected from various free internet speech databases, such as the International Dialects of English Archive (http://www.ku.edu/~idea/), the World Voices Collection (http://www.world-voices.com/), the Indian institute of scientific heritage (http://www.iish.org/), and others.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com