Sentence examples for evaluating priority from inspiring English sources

In this paper we identify indicators of success for evaluating priority setting processes (the evaluation process), and present the results of a pilot study which tested whether this evaluation process was effective in evaluating priority setting success.

An important first step to evaluating priority setting is knowing what good, or successful, priority setting looks like [ 12].

Recently, research has led to better understanding of evaluating priority setting activity including defining 'success' and articulating key elements for high performance.

The framework we describe here is a new development for evaluating priority setting; it can provide guidance to decision makers and scholars interested in successful priority setting.

By describing and evaluating priority setting using the four conditions of 'accountability for reasonableness', we are able to identify examples of 'good practices' that other hospital should emulate, and 'opportunities for improvement' that this and other hospitals should consider.

The three health research prioritization processes performed in Panama between 2006 and 2011 were analyzed based on the guidelines established by the four "Accountability for Reasonableness" principles, namely "relevance", "publicity", "revision", and "enforcement", which provide a framework for evaluating priority-setting fairness.

Given that we lack consensus on the meaning of successful priority setting, the evaluation process we have created is an initial attempt to evaluate priority setting decisions in a specific context.

To describe and evaluate priority setting in the context of hospital priority setting and more specifically to evaluate the use of an appeals process.

The GDS application of the LUCAS model has also been developed as a tool to evaluate priority ecosystem services, including C sequestration, as a function of future adaptive management strategies.

However, there is lack of literature that describes and evaluates priority setting in these contexts.

'Accountability for reasonableness' has been used to evaluate priority setting in health systems [ 11].