Sentence examples for evaluating facts from inspiring English sources

John DiIulio, who was brought into the White House to implement Mr Bush's "faith-based initiative", was told to retract his criticism that the administration lacked a proper policy shop for evaluating facts and arguments impartially.

The book contends that from law school on through their careers, lawyers are so imbued with the concepts of serving a client in an adversarial arena ("zealous advocacy," in legal parlance) and unemotionally evaluating facts and rules ("thinking like a lawyer," as the phrase goes) that they fail to answer to any overarching sense of right and wrong.

Bear Stearns, CSFB, Goldman, Lehman, Merrill, Piper Jaffray, Citigroup and UBS are also accused of issuing research reports not based on principles of fair dealing, and which did not provide a sound basis for evaluating facts and which contained exaggerated claims.

Only one study evaluating FACT-F as primary end point in patients receiving chemotherapy was placebo controlled, and so we cannot gauge the extent to which the effect observed for primary vs secondary end point was confounded by lack of blinding.

It is no longer a positive attribute to seek out truth, determine biases, evaluate facts, or share knowledge.

He and others know that most people don't sit around and evaluate facts and policies since they have neither the time nor the preparation.

It is likely that higher socio-economic individuals may be better able to evaluate facts or evidence, whereas those from lower socio-economic groups may be more prone to use emotions to guide their decision-making.

Recently, a Dutch expert group embedded in the Centre for Certification ACT & FACT evaluated working ingredients and formulated fidelity criteria to evaluate FACT rather than ACT.

"The hierarchical rank of the perpetrator must be of no consequence in evaluating the facts," she said.

Finra found that Morgan Keegan sold shares in a large fund from January 2006 to September 2007, "using sales materials that contained exaggerated claims, failed to provide a sound basis for evaluating the facts regarding the fund, were not fair and balanced and did not adequately disclose the impact of market conditions in 2007 that caused substantial losses" to the fund's value.

This might be explained by patients' insecurity evaluating medical facts, which can be seen in terms of knowledge on relapse.