To evaluate the mapping consistency, accurate 3D point cloud data measured by Faro Focus 3D (± 3 mm) was used as the ground truth.
To evaluate the mapping performance after the coordinate rotation, correcting X Y mismatches and rectifying the distortion, the laser diode mounted on the 3D precision moving stage was used to generate various laser traces onto the PSD.
CuReSim and CuReSimEval, a tool to evaluate the mapping quality of the CuReSim simulated reads, are freely available.
N simulations (w=1,.., N) were performed to evaluate the mapping accuracy and the relative efficiency of the different AIP in different situations.
The read simulator is freely distributed along with a tool to evaluate the mapping quality, CuReSimEval; both are available at http://www.pegase-biosciences.com/tools/curesim/.
If we regard Table 1, hypothetically, as a contingency table of genotype counts, then taking row sums (or, equivalently, column sums) corresponds precisely to evaluating the mapping ρ.
To quantitatively evaluate the mapping results, we dissected reference genome sequences into two types of segments gene and IGR and calculated "coverage rate" of each segment.
First, we evaluated the mapping ratio, duplication ratio, and genome coverage uniformity using the single-cell low-coverage whole genome sequencing (LWGS) data or the extracted single-cell LWGS data.
The Justice Department evaluated the map to see whether it adhered to the federal Voting Rights Act, which protects minority voting rights.
Finally, a new specific error index, that can also be applied to maps lacking an explicit graphical scale, is proposed to evaluate the map truthfulness degree.
