Your English writing platform
Free sign upExact(5)
The AFM data were evaluated with the software package Gwyddion [37].
To compare the results both hull forms are developed in CAD and discretized and the resistance components evaluated with the software SHIPFLOW.
Absorption spectra were measured on a Cary-4E spectrometer (Varian, Mulgrave, Australia), captured between 220 and 550 nm for Alexa 488 (ε = 71,000 cm−1M−1) and 220 and 700 nm for Alexa 647 (ε = 237,000 cm−1M−1) labeled protein and evaluated with the software Cary Win UV (Version 02.00 25)).
The results were evaluated with the software CFX Manager 3.0 (Bio-Rad).
Chemical and behavioural data were evaluated with the software PRIMER 6 (version 6.1.12, Primer-E Ltd., Ivybridge, U.K). with the PERMANOVA+ add-in (version 1.0.2) using a non-parametric permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) with 9,999 permutations [ 34].
Similar(55)
Chromatograms were evaluated with the appending software package GenomeLab GeXP Genetic Analysis System version 10.2 by applying the Fragment Analysis Module.
The experimental data were evaluated with the WinStat software (R. Fitch Software, Bad Krozingen, Germany) employing the Kolmogorov Smirnov test to determine normal distribution and Pearson correlation, t-tests, or two-way ANCOVAs with interactions for subsequent analyses.
The 22 stringently identified genes were evaluated with the online software Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; this software identifies groups of genes that are overrepresented using an unbiased algorithm based upon the Gene Ontology classification (Huang da et al. 2009).
The thermographic images were evaluated with the dedicated software IRTCronista.
Data were evaluated with the BiaEvaluation software (GE Healthcare) using simultaneous fit of association and dissociation.
Data were evaluated with the flowjo software.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com