evaluated with

USAGE SUMMARY

"evaluated with" is a correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
You can use it when you want to express that something is being assessed or judged in relation to something else. For example: "The team's performance was evaluated with respect to the goal set during the previous meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

The data company evaluated 42 million residential properties with mortgages.

The New York Times

Of those evaluated, 248 had been given soy formula and 563 cow milk formula.

The New York Times - Health

Consumers evaluated 114 companies in 12 industries on their usefulness, ease of use and enjoyability.

The New York Times

The McKinsey consultants evaluated 16 tasks undertaken by the police on 9/11.

The New York Times

They evaluated 206 varieties from nine companies in 2012.

Cornell University

Researchers evaluated 29 American studies performed between 1938 and 1996.

Harvard University

They evaluated 225 varieties from seven companies in 2011.

Cornell University

Pain-induced hyper-mechanosensitivity was evaluated 3 days (CFA) or 3 weeks (MIA) after administration.

Nature

As negative control, the same system without the polymerase PB2 was evaluated (2P-NP).

Nature

One study evaluated 90-day mortality68, and two assessed one year mortality after discharge58,69.

Nature

CAV1 downregulation or upregulation was evaluated 48 h post-transfection by western blotting.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "evaluated with", ensure that the 'with' clause clearly specifies the criteria, tools, or context used for the evaluation to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "evaluated with" without specifying what the evaluation was conducted with. For example, instead of saying "The project was evaluated with the team", specify "The project was evaluated with the team's feedback" for clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evaluated with" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb. It indicates the method, criteria, or instrument used in performing an evaluation. Ludwig AI states that this usage is correct.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "evaluated with" is a grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to specify the methods, criteria, or tools employed in an evaluation. As Ludwig AI confirms, this is a valid and usable construction in English writing. Due to the limited examples available, it's difficult to ascertain specific usage patterns, but it can be effectively substituted with phrases like "assessed using" or "judged by means of" to achieve similar meaning. For clarity, it's crucial to specify the 'with' clause to avoid vagueness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assessed using

Focuses on the method or tool used in the evaluation.

judged by means of

Implies a formal or structured assessment process.

examined in light of

Suggests considering something within a specific context or perspective.

appraised considering

Highlights a thorough and thoughtful evaluation process.

measured against

Emphasizes comparison to a standard or benchmark.

analyzed with reference to

Indicates a detailed analysis incorporating specific data points.

rated according to

Implies a scoring system or specific criteria for rating.

checked in relation to

Focuses on verifying or confirming something based on specific factors.

reviewed incorporating

Suggests a comprehensive examination that includes various elements.

determined through

Highlights the method by which a conclusion or result was reached.

FAQs

How can I use "evaluated with" in a sentence?

Use "evaluated with" to specify the tools, criteria, or context used in an assessment. For example, "The candidate's skills were evaluated with a series of practical tests."

What's a good alternative to "evaluated with"?

Alternatives include "assessed using", "judged by means of", or "examined in light of", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "evaluated by" instead of "evaluated with"?

Yes, "evaluated by" is also correct and often interchangeable. "Evaluated by" emphasizes the evaluator, while "evaluated with" emphasizes the tools or criteria used. Choose the option that best fits your intended meaning.

What's the difference between "evaluated with respect to" and "evaluated with"?

"Evaluated with respect to" implies a more formal and detailed assessment considering specific aspects or parameters, while "evaluated with" is a more general statement about the tools or criteria used. For example, "The proposal was evaluated with respect to its feasibility" is more precise than "The proposal was evaluated with the team".