Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "evaluated using three indicators" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it whenever you need to describe a process of measuring or determining the value of something based on three points of reference. For example, "The team's performance was evaluated using three indicators: customer satisfaction, task completion rate, and safety compliance."
Exact(1)
Thermal performance of the heat pipes are evaluated using three indicators; (i) the temperature difference between the heat source and heat sink surfaces, (ii) the temperature difference between the peak system temperature and the temperature of the cooling ambient and (iii) heat pipe effectiveness defined as a temperature difference ratio under dry and operating conditions.
Similar(59)
Goodness of fit of the LGC models was evaluated using five indicators: χ test, comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker-Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean residual (SRMR).
The performance of the model was evaluated using four statistical indicators customarily used in hydrological models54: the Pearson's correlation coefficient (r), the ratio of the root mean square error to the standard deviation of measured data (RSR), the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and the per cent bias (PBIAS).
Quality of near end-of-life (EOL) care is typically evaluated using six accepted quality indicators (QIs).
120 listed indicators are evaluated using four usefulness criteria, demonstrating significant weaknesses in the available indicators.
Designs are evaluated using two different targeting moieties.
The goodness-of-fit of the models was evaluated by using two indicators: the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) where values below 0.06 indicate a good fit [ 27] and the CFI where values larger than 0.90 or close to 0.95 indicate a good fit [ 32].
Behavior was measured using two indicators.
Associations between water recreation and illness were evaluated in three-group models using two indicator variables (CAWS vs. other, GUW vs. other, with UNX as the reference category).
The assessments were evaluated using the nine GHC indicators that correspond to health resources availability assessments (out of a total of 26 indicators), based on whether they were capable of collecting the necessary data for calculating each of the indicators.
We used two indicators to evaluate the reconstruction results: the reconstruction time (Time) of these algorithms and the distance (Loc_Err) between the actual source position and the reconstruction position.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com