Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
28 Annual FEV1 changes at sample collection were evaluated using FEV1 data obtained a year before sample collection, at sample collection and a year after sample collection.
All phases, from pre-admission to patient discharge for a standard patient without complications, were evaluated using retrospective data related to the study sample in terms of time needed for percutaneous ablation, considering the number of lesions and length of hospitalisation.
Annual FEV1 changes were evaluated using FEV1 data acquired a year before and a year after sample collection.
The data requirements and potential bias in estimated baseflow index (BFI) were evaluated using conductivity data for different seasons and/or resampled data segments at various sampling durations.
Group differences in demographic variables were evaluated using independent sample t-tests for continuous data, and with the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for categorical data.
Internal consistency was evaluated using data gathered from the community-based sample.
This was evaluated using data gathered from the community-based sample.
The proposed method has been evaluated using data set of handwritten Bangla digits, and the results certified that the GA-based region sampling outperforms several existing methods.
This predictive model was evaluated using an external data set.
Biomarker data were log2-transformed, and changes from baseline were evaluated using one-sample t tests.
Each isolate was evaluated using six samples.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com