Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(27)
The quality of the genome assemblies was evaluated using five different criteria (Supplementary Note 1).
The performance of the proposed method is evaluated using five classical test functions.
The retrieval uncertainties from land cover data were evaluated using five different data sets available in China.
Data were evaluated using five models (Raoult's law, and the Ross, Ferro Fontán Chirife Benmergui, Zdanovskii Stokes Robinson, and extended Zdanovskii Stokes Robinson equations), and the extended Zdanovskii Stokes Robinson equation provided the best fit.
Quantitative extraction was obtained, with good accuracy (ca. 90% recovery) and precision (R.S.D. < 9%), evaluated using five CRMs (coal fly ash SRM1633a, urban dust SRM1649a, marine sediments BCSS1 and PACS1, soil GBW07401).
The tensile creep behavior of polyethylene-terephthalate (PET) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) geogrids was evaluated using five test methods: the short- and long-term stepped isothermal method (SIM), the short- and long-term time-temperature superposition (TTS), and the conventional method.
Similar(33)
120 listed indicators are evaluated using four usefulness criteria, demonstrating significant weaknesses in the available indicators.
The performance of iGEC is evaluated using eight commonly-used data sets.
The estimated reflectances are evaluated using three evaluation metrics: GFC, RMS and Δ E a b * described previously.
Designs are evaluated using two different targeting moieties.
The proposed approach is evaluated using two clinical cases.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com