Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(9)
The evaluated teeth exhibited a relatively high prevalence of type IV canals in mesial (M) roots (76.8%) and type I canals in the distal (D) (79.4%), distobuccal (DB) (98.7%), and distolingual (DL) (100%) roots.
In group 1 (Damon), of the 200 evaluated teeth, 93 showed no radiographically visible root resorption, 83 showed slight resorption, 20 moderate resorption, four severe resorption, and none showed extreme resorption.
Table 4 Number and percentage of all evaluated teeth with the different levels of external apical root resorption Resorption n % No root involvement 207 49.7 Mild 157 37.7 Moderate 44 10.5 Accentuated 8 1.9.
In group 2 (non-self-ligating), of the 216 evaluated teeth, 114 showed no radiographically visible root resorption, 74 showed slight resorption, 24 moderate resorption, four severe resorption, and none showed extreme resorption (Table 3).
Mean values of vEMD were not significantly different in all the evaluated teeth (P > 0.05).
The Mann–Whitney U test did not reveal any difference in the distribution of the CAST index in evaluated teeth according to age and sex.
Similar(51)
Gungor and Turkkahraman [16] evaluated tooth dimensions in mild and severe hypodontia cases and found that the mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions of the teeth in both mild and severe hypodontia were smaller.
Our study quantitatively evaluated tooth brushing motion as the individual's toothbrush frequency, coordinated movement of the joints of the arm, and rhythm generation of brushing.
An in vivo analysis was performed by implanting the constructs into the omentum of immunocompromised rats and evaluating tooth production up to 25 weeks.
The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate tooth emergence timing between children positive and negative for HIV in the exposed and unexposed groups, respectively.
The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate tooth color change after exposure to 25% hydrogen peroxide in-office tooth whitening system, with and without supplementary light exposure.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com