Sentence examples for evaluated no significant differences from inspiring English sources

When force plate results of different surgical technique groups were evaluated, no significant differences were found in study group between intracapsular, extracapsular and osteotomy techniques, or either in study group or subgroup 1 when surgically treated limbs in each technique group separately were compared with pelvic limbs in control dogs.

This is in contrast to some other studies which evaluated no significant differences of stability parameters between primary and secondary stability with immediate loading in edentulous maxilla [16, 21, 22].

When this parameter was evaluated, no significant differences in the weight of chow food per mouse per day were found between ctsk−/− and WT mice for young (3.83±1.13 versus 3.95±1.36 g/ mouse/day) or adult animals (4.04±1.35 versus 3.97±1.57 g/ mouse/day).

When the average expression from each cat was evaluated, no significant differences in expression were apparent.

Furthermore, when the survival curves of MTC patients from the three groups were evaluated, no significant differences were observed between each group (data not shown).

When the metabolites of capecitabine were evaluated, no significant differences in AUCs for DFCR, DFUR, and 5FU between patients <60 and ⩾70 years old were detected.

When the symptom scores for the re-treated patients were evaluated, no significant difference was found in comparison with the group of first injections in previously untreated achalasia patients (table 3).

Between the four evaluated groups no significant differences were found in the quantity of SP-B and SP-C (Fig. 4).

Different mobile phases evaluated showed no significant differences.

The effect of cellular uptake of UCNPs on the osteogenic differentiation of rBMSCs was systematically evaluated, and no significant difference was found between rBMSCs labeled with UCNPs (concentration range of 0 50 μg/mL) and UCNPs-free rBMSCs in terms of cell viability, ALP activity, osteogenic protein expressions and production of mineralized nodules.

However, when groups were evaluated separately, no significant difference was found between postoperative and contralateral side values.