Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Of 101 menu items individually evaluated, no items were significantly associated with illness in the absence of adjustment for possible confounders.
Similar(59)
Analyzed by checklist item, STROBE (34 items) and PRISMA (27 items) were the only reporting guidelines with all items evaluated; the QUOROM (1/17 items), STARD (1/25 items), and STRICTA (17/20 items) guidelines were evaluated for a subset of items.
The questionnaire included six items evaluating depression, six items evaluating anxiety, and three items evaluating happiness and optimism.
First, we evaluated these items individually and then combined them in summary scales.
The total item correlation was evaluated, and items that achieved a score of ≥ 0.5 were accepted [ 39].
Of all the 23 items evaluated, 6 items (26%) showed a moderate reliability, 12 items (52%) displayed a substantial reliability and 4 items (17%) indicated almost perfect reliability.
A questionnaire to expert reviewers evaluated sensibility items, such as ease of use and comprehensiveness.
Then an expert panel evaluated the items by assessing content validity index and content validity ratio.
Symptom interference score was evaluated using items 14 19 of the MDASI.
The questions to assess these subscales are listed in Additional files 1 and 2. A Likert scale ranging from 1 (totally disagree) to 6 (totally agree) was used for evaluating the items, no neutral response option.
Since some of the items encompass sub-items, we evaluated each sub-item as a separate entity in this study.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com