Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(8)
The assessment costs were also evaluated (laboratory tests and radiological evaluation).
We evaluated laboratory changes and clinical outcomes in the early phase of obstetric DIC.
Serum CRP and interleukin-6 comprised the evaluated laboratory inflammatory markers in the present investigation.
We evaluated laboratory and pulmonary imaging findings that were obtained within 96 hours of hospital presentation and adverse outcome manifestations (hospital admission, severe respiratory complications, mortality) that were recorded within ≤ 7 days of hospital presentation.
Among the evaluated laboratory parameters, serum CRP levels and neutrophil percentage in a complete blood count (CBC) obtained within 24 hours of admission comprised the only two factors that significantly differentiated between patients who needed to be admitted to the ICU and those who could remain on the ward (Table 1).
Evaluated laboratory data were activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), the amounts of prothrombin fragment (F1 + 2), interleukin-6 (IL-6), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and pentraxin-3 (PTX3).
Similar(52)
De-identified laboratory IDs were assigned to each private laboratory which reflect the relative cost of sputum smear microscopy among the evaluated laboratories, with 1 being the most and 7 the least expensive.
To evaluate laboratory models using accelerated aging to assess surface light scattering in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs).
The aim of this study was to evaluate laboratory methodologies for determining ash hydraulic conductivity and sorptivity based on established methodologies from soil measurements.
Before study implementation, we tested 50 MTB isolates of known resistance patterns from WHO's External Quality Assurance program to evaluate laboratory proficiency in using this assay.
The latter samples were pools made up of multiple units of fresh frozen plasma obtained from a local hospital and used routinely to evaluate laboratory reproducibility.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com