In this case, three of the four groups evaluated demonstrated highly significant increases (P < 0.001 likelihood).
After the difference between GND-ICA and WPD is evaluated, a highly significant difference is found between S and V.
After the difference between GND-ICA and PCA is evaluated, a highly significant difference is found between S and V; likewise, a significant difference is observed in N. Therefore, highly significant differences are observed between GND-ICA and WPD and between GND-ICA and PCA.
We evaluate the effect of a highly significant gene found in each of the data sets (IL23R) by regressing case control status onto SNPs located within IL23R.
Also each reader's assessment showed a highly significant difference when evaluated separately.
As proposed by Koi (2006), a significance score with a scale ranging from 0 (not significant) to 5 (highly significant) was used to evaluate the hub port selection criteria.
This intra-site correlation is highly significant for each placenta as evaluated by ANOVA (Table II).
Probability values were scored for three levels of significance: p≦0.001 very highly significant, p≦0.01 highly significant, and p≦0.05 significant.
Effects of years and locations were highly significant (p < 0.001) for all traits evaluated in multiple locations (data not shown).
The four study groups were well matched, and the results are highly significant, however they will have to be evaluated in a larger trial.
