evaluated for errors

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "evaluated for errors" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the process of checking something, such as a document or a program, for mistakes or issues. Example: "Before submission, the report must be thoroughly evaluated for errors to ensure accuracy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

As the original genome assembly size was ~373 Mbp, a total of ~321 Mbp could be evaluated for sequencing errors.

Rice

In contrast to the analysis performed for Brachypodium, sorghum GH gene models were not systematically evaluated for potential errors, nor did we search for GH genes not contained in the annotation.

BMC Genomics

Furthermore, model performance is evaluated for measurement error conditions, different genetic algorithm parameter combinations, different numbers and locations of the monitoring wells, and different heterogeneous hydraulic conductivity fields.

Journal of Hydrology

Combining information on individual water use with water zone estimates could provide better exposure estimates, but the individual information should be evaluated for measurement error, because within-subject variability in questionnaire data may be substantial (Forssén et al. 2008) and attenuate risk estimates.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Proportional, additive, and combined proportional and additive error structures were evaluated for the residual error.

CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology

Exponential, additive, and combined error structures were evaluated for the residual error terms.

CPT: Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology

The UMD3.1 and Btau4.6 references were first evaluated for large-scale errors by inspection of the pairwise alignments [ 25, 26] of the entire Rmap dataset against BamH1 in silico restriction maps (constructed in the computer) of both sequence builds (Materials and Methods).

BMC Genomics

The performance of the models were evaluated for accuracy, misclassification error rate, sensitivity and specificity.

Complex & Intelligent Systems

The FITR was developed and evaluated for type I error rate and power under ideal conditions of "selectively neutral" reference loci evolving independently of the focal locus and of each other, allele frequencies at reference loci ≠ 0 or 1, definable FITR statistics, and exactly known population allele frequencies.

G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics

Three sub-headings of COD statement of DC- Part I Immediate COD (ICOD), Part I Underlying COD (UCOD), and Part II Other significant conditions (OSC) were extensively evaluated for the major medical errors.

BMC Health Services Research

This external validation is useful to stop the training when the mean squared error evaluated for a data set not used in the adaptation of the MLP weights and biases (validation data set) is increasing for consecutive algorithm iterations.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "evaluated for errors", ensure that the evaluation process is clearly defined and the criteria for identifying errors are well-established.

Common error

Avoid using "evaluated for errors" without specifying the type of errors being evaluated. Be precise about what aspects are being checked to provide context and clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evaluated for errors" functions as a passive construction describing an action performed on a subject. It indicates that something has undergone a process of assessment to identify mistakes or inaccuracies. While Ludwig provides example sentences, none match the exact query.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "evaluated for errors" describes the process of carefully assessing something to identify any mistakes or inaccuracies. Ludwig's analysis indicates that while the phrase is grammatically correct, the data returned no exact examples. The phrase tends to be used in formal and scientific contexts, reflecting its role in describing systematic assessment processes. Alternative phrases like "checked for mistakes" or "assessed for inaccuracies" can be used depending on the specific context. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is correct and usable in written English.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assessed for inaccuracies

Focuses specifically on the detection of inaccuracies.

checked for mistakes

A more general term for finding errors.

verified for correctness

Emphasizes ensuring the accuracy and validity of something.

inspected for defects

Implies a detailed examination to find flaws or imperfections.

audited for discrepancies

Used in contexts where formal auditing or accounting is involved.

examined for flaws

Highlights the identification of imperfections or shortcomings.

reviewed for oversights

Focuses on identifying missed or neglected aspects.

investigated for faults

Suggests a more in-depth inquiry to find underlying problems.

tested for bugs

Commonly used in software development to find errors in code.

screened for anomalies

Indicates a process of filtering out unusual or unexpected results.

FAQs

What does "evaluated for errors" mean?

The phrase "evaluated for errors" means that something has been examined or assessed to identify any mistakes, inaccuracies, or faults.

How can I use "evaluated for errors" in a sentence?

You can use "evaluated for errors" to describe the process of checking something for mistakes, such as "The document was thoroughly evaluated for errors before submission."

What are some alternatives to "evaluated for errors"?

Alternatives include "checked for mistakes", "assessed for inaccuracies", or "inspected for defects", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "evaluated for errors" or "checked for errors"?

Both "evaluated for errors" and "checked for errors" are correct, but "evaluated" suggests a more formal or systematic assessment, while "checked" implies a simpler, more direct examination.