From the 3 and 5 respective candidate NV GI and NV GII primer sets that were evaluated for efficiency using clinical samples, the most efficient primer sets were selected and used in this study (Table 3).
Finally, it is implemented and evaluated for efficiency.
The primers and probes were evaluated for their efficiency and dynamic range and subsequently the specificity of the assay was tested using 106 Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica strains and 30 non-salmonellae strains.
Laboratory- and pilot-scale MEO systems were designed and evaluated for treatment efficiency and membrane fouling control.
The dsRNAs used for the characterisation of selected screen hits were independently designed and each probe was evaluated for its efficiency and potential off-target effects on the website http://e-rnai.dkfz.de [67].
§Calculated as reported by van Walsum [ 21] Three small-scale reaction systems with different mixing modes (shaking, gravitational tumbling and hand stirring) were evaluated for their efficiency and consistency in converting high-solids loadings of biomass.
All vectors were evaluated for their efficiency and impact on metabolic activity, cell membrane integrity, chromosomal aberrations (micronuclei formation), gene dysregulation, and differentiation ability of stem cells.
However, before any stove is introduced on the market, it is first evaluated for its efficiency and usability against set international standards [5].
Thus, the use of such TRAIL-sensitizing strategies should be carefully evaluated for both efficiency and toxicity in vivo before consideration for clinical use.
Three different designs of CSTR with Napier grass as substance were evaluated for mixing efficiency, vorticity, and flow behavior, Model 1: one propeller no baffle tank, Model 2: one propeller with baffles tank, and Model 3: double propellers with baffles tank.
