Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Since the future aim is to discriminate between healthy distributions and less severe COPD distributions, the optimal CVT value was evaluated by finding the largest separation between corresponding AUC CVT) values for the healthy 'uniform' and the '1-cm50% 10% evenly' distributions (distributions 1 and 2 in Table 1) in the simulated COPD study.
Similar(59)
Data evaluated by ANN allowed finding the optimal values of several analytical parameters (peak area, peak height, and analysis time).
Best clinical responses were evaluated by radiological findings.
There were two minor responses and four no-change cases, as evaluated by radiological findings.
The clinical response to CRT was evaluated by the findings of oesophagography, oesophagoscopy, endoscopic ultrasonography, and computed tomography.
We evaluated this hypothesis by finding the number of unique genes in each of the seven strains reported here along with seven previously published strains, using the results of our analytical pipeline.
We have developed GFD-Net, a Cytoscape app that allows evaluating gene networks by finding the most common function among its genes, weighting of its edges and obtaining a value of is functional dissimilarity, as well as providing an easy way to visualize the results.
The impact was evaluated by comparing these baseline findings with the findings of the HUES 2010 that have generated comparable data for MIP targeted poor population, and the poor and general population not covered by MIP benefits (Table 2).
Included were bony and cartilaginous findings evaluated by inspection and palpation within the lateral head of the gastrocnemius muscle [ 15].
The diagnosis of NETs was made on the basis of morphological and immunohistochemical findings evaluated by two independent pathologists (ZRQ and TS), according to the World Health Organization classification (Klöppel et al, 2004).
Overall task completion time and their findings were evaluated by analysing the recorded interaction logs and the captured findings.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com