Suggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The goodness of fit of the model was evaluated by coefficient of determination (R 2) value and it is seen that all models are statistically significant.
The intraday and interday precision and accuracy of the method were evaluated by coefficient of variation (CV) and relative error (RE; RE = 100 × [(predicted concentration − nominal concentration)/nominal concentration]).
Similar(58)
The performances of the models were evaluated by using coefficient of determination, coefficient of efficiency and root mean squared error.
The goodness fit of the model was evaluated by the coefficient R 2. The multiple correlation coefficient was 0.82, which explained 82% of the variation in the response.
The quality of the fit of the polynomial model equation was evaluated by the coefficient of determination R2, and its regression coefficient significance was checked with F-test.
The applicability of the isotherm model was evaluated by the coefficient of correlation value (R 2).
The goodness of fit of the model was evaluated by the coefficient of determination (R 2).
Bendability was evaluated by the coefficient of shear strain concentration index using two-scale FE results.
The accuracy and general ability of the above polynomial model could be evaluated by the coefficient of determination R2.
The goodness of fit of the model was evaluated by the coefficient of determination R 2 and the analysis of variance (ANOVA).
The goodness of fit of the model was evaluated by the coefficient of determination R 2 and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) [16].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com