Exact(3)
KSSK and KSSF scores were evaluated between groups at 4 weeks and at the most recent follow-up by Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
The patients were divided into 4 groups depending on MIA scores and the ACS, graft outcome, and mortality were evaluated between groups.
The differences in SAA concentrations, leukograms (WBC, neutrophil and lymphocyte numbers and N L ratio) and erythrograms (RBC, HGB and HCT) were evaluated between groups and in response to exercise in each group.
Similar(5)
Exploratory analyses evaluated between-group differences in conjunctival hyperemia severity after 6 weeks of treatment.
Accordingly, we evaluated between-group differences at the 4-month assessment (i.e., immediately posttreatment), controlling for baseline scores.
Considering the added burden of P. aeruginosa on resource utilization [ 4- 6], we also evaluated between-group differences in microbiologic outcome and medical resource utilization in patients with P. aeruginosa at baseline.
ANCOVAs evaluating between-group differences in reported sleep problems showed a significant main effect of group.
We used linear mixed models and logistic regression models to evaluate between-group differences over time.
Related(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com