Ai Feedback
Exact(4)
The intensity of the fluorescence was qualitatively evaluated as weak, medium, or strong.
These recommendations were evaluated as "weak" by the BTF, with the option to preferentially triage pediatric severe TBI patients to ATC-AQs over ATCs primarily based on the availability of a single retrospective study (Potoka et al. 2000).
The intensity of staining was also evaluated as weak (1+), moderate (2+) or strong (3+).
The staining intensity of mesothelin was evaluated as weak (+1), moderate to strong (+2) in addition to the staining localisation in the luminal membrane or in cytoplasm.
Similar(56)
Parameters of angiogenesis were evaluated as above.
Expression intensity was evaluated as negative, weak, medium, or strong.
Staining intensity was evaluated as 1+ (weak), 2+ (moderate), or 3+ (strong).
Intensity of staining was evaluated as absent, weak staining in fewer than 5% of cells, staining in >5% but <50% of cells, moderate staining in >50% of cells and strong staining in >50% of cells.
The fraction of CD44 positive cells was evaluated semi-quantitatively in four grades of percentages of stained malignant cells: 0 (0%), 1 (1–25%), 2 (26 75%), or 3 (76–100%) and the intensity of the staining was scored separately and evaluated as absent, weak, moderate, and strong staining 11.
Expression intensity in each compartment was evaluated as negative, weak, medium, or strong (0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively), and the tumors were additionally evaluated for percentage stained cells where score 0 was <1 %, score 1 was 1 25 %, score 2 was 26 75 %, and score 3 was >75 %.
The first questionnaire was given to both groups to determine which phase was evaluated as the weakest.
Related(16)
rated as weak
categorized as weak
evaluated as minimal
viewed as weak
identified as weak
characterized as weak
measured as weak
evaluated as unsatisfactory
evaluated as unstable
evaluated as inadequate
understood as weak
evaluated as poor
evaluated as ineffective
evaluated as low
evaluated as moderate
evaluated as vulnerable
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com