Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
Exact(26)
PDPN was evaluated as: negative expression, ≤ 10%; low expression, 10 50%; and high expression, >50% [ 28, 29].
The recordings were subsequently evaluated by a pair of laryngologists (Michal Zabrodsky and Petr Lukes); the findings were evaluated as negative or positive only in case both concurred on the final evaluation.
Plants treated only with distilled water were evaluated as negative controls.
Cucumber plants that had received neither EB nor pathogen were evaluated as negative controls (Fig. 1d).
Lachman test was evaluated as negative in all patients (100 %); Pivot-shift test was found to be negative (grade 0) in 16 patients (80 %) and positive (grade 1) in 4 patients (20%%).
Wells with the V. cholerae mutant (vpsR) that is deficient in biofilm production were evaluated as negative controls.
Similar(34)
Since the construction of our negative rows for the calculations of the sensitivity and specificity came from different sources (those evaluated as negatives and that had reported negative both of the screening algorithms (hip/knee) and those evaluated as negatives and that had reported negative to one of the screening algorithms (hip or knee)) we studied the presence of some bias.
In both joints, the analysis between those evaluated as negatives and that had reported negative both of the screening algorithms (hip/knee) versus those who were negative to the explored joint but not the other on relation to the final diagnosis of osteoarthritis showed not statistically significant differences in both joints for those groups.
The predictive values, positive (PPV) as well as negative (NPV), were evaluated, as well as the positive and negative likelihood ratios (+LR and –LR, resp).
From infancy, people physically approach things they evaluate as positive and withdraw from things they evaluate as negative, a behavior that humans share with the simplest of organisms [1], [2].
The solvent used in the reconstitution of the extract (ethanol or DMSO) was evaluated as a negative control for each test in the same volume as the extracts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com