Suggestions(5)
Exact(2)
The Reviewing editor and the reviewers discussed their comments before we reached this decision, and the Reviewing editor has assembled the following comments to help you prepare a revised submission. 1) All reviewers found it difficult to evaluate this paper without reference to your recent 2014 PNAS paper.
If it's the actin cortex, which is a tight meshwork of isotropically oriented filaments, then how well is it really modeled by the branched architecture of actin in the lamellipodium? 1) All reviewers found it difficult to evaluate this paper without reference to your recent 2014 PNAS paper.
Similar(58)
Several performance measures were evaluated; this paper focuses on relational continuity.
Such an intermediate range data-evaluation method is described and evaluated in this paper.
Several performance parameters were evaluated, but this paper focuses on a patient reported measure of relational continuity (hereafter referred to as "continuity").
Disease classification, disease activity and functionality of RA were evaluated in this paper using standardized methods that are classical for evaluation of patients seen in the Western world.
This phenomenon is evaluated in this paper.
Table 24 describes the hypotheses evaluated in this paper.
Section 2.2 presents the tools evaluated in this paper.
Several hip stems were re-evaluated in this paper.
Four inversion methods are evaluated in this paper.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com